Links
- Handicapping Edge <% if LEN(SESSION("ADMIN"))>0 then %>
- Control Panel
- Wesite Doc
- Blog Editor <% end if %>
Archives
- Sunday, January 25, 2004
- Monday, June 07, 2004
- Thursday, July 01, 2004
- Monday, July 05, 2004
- Thursday, July 15, 2004
- Friday, July 16, 2004
- Thursday, July 29, 2004
- Wednesday, August 04, 2004
- Saturday, August 28, 2004
- Tuesday, August 31, 2004
- Wednesday, September 01, 2004
- Thursday, September 02, 2004
- Friday, September 03, 2004
- Sunday, September 05, 2004
- Monday, September 06, 2004
- Friday, September 17, 2004
- Saturday, October 02, 2004
- Tuesday, October 05, 2004
- Wednesday, October 06, 2004
- Monday, October 25, 2004
- Tuesday, October 26, 2004
- Wednesday, December 08, 2004
- Thursday, January 06, 2005
- Saturday, February 05, 2005
- Monday, February 28, 2005
- Thursday, March 24, 2005
- Thursday, March 31, 2005
- Friday, April 01, 2005
- Monday, April 04, 2005
- Thursday, May 05, 2005
- Friday, May 06, 2005
- Wednesday, May 18, 2005
- Thursday, May 19, 2005
- Friday, May 20, 2005
- Monday, June 06, 2005
- Thursday, June 09, 2005
- Friday, June 10, 2005
- Saturday, June 11, 2005
- Monday, June 13, 2005
- Friday, July 01, 2005
- Saturday, July 02, 2005
- Thursday, July 14, 2005
- Friday, July 15, 2005
- Saturday, July 16, 2005
- Tuesday, July 26, 2005
- Thursday, September 01, 2005
- Friday, September 30, 2005
- Saturday, October 01, 2005
- Sunday, October 02, 2005
- Tuesday, October 04, 2005
- Monday, October 24, 2005
- Wednesday, October 26, 2005
- Thursday, October 27, 2005
- Friday, October 28, 2005
- Saturday, November 12, 2005
- Friday, December 16, 2005
- Sunday, January 29, 2006
- Wednesday, March 15, 2006
- Thursday, April 06, 2006
- Friday, April 07, 2006
- Saturday, April 08, 2006
- Thursday, May 04, 2006
- Friday, May 05, 2006
- Saturday, May 06, 2006
- Friday, May 19, 2006
- Saturday, May 20, 2006
- Saturday, May 27, 2006
- Friday, June 09, 2006
- Friday, July 07, 2006
- Friday, July 14, 2006
- Wednesday, August 09, 2006
- Wednesday, August 23, 2006
- Friday, September 29, 2006
- Saturday, September 30, 2006
- Sunday, October 01, 2006
- Tuesday, October 31, 2006
- Wednesday, November 01, 2006
- Thursday, November 02, 2006
- Friday, November 03, 2006
- Monday, November 13, 2006
- Thursday, January 04, 2007
- Friday, February 16, 2007
- Sunday, April 22, 2007
- Thursday, May 03, 2007
- Friday, May 04, 2007
- Friday, May 18, 2007
- Thursday, June 07, 2007
- Sunday, June 24, 2007
- Friday, August 10, 2007
- Sunday, August 12, 2007
- Friday, August 17, 2007
- Tuesday, September 18, 2007
- Wednesday, September 19, 2007
- Friday, October 05, 2007
- Saturday, October 06, 2007
- Wednesday, October 24, 2007
- Thursday, October 25, 2007
- Friday, October 26, 2007
- Saturday, October 27, 2007
- Monday, November 19, 2007
- Monday, January 07, 2008
- Monday, February 18, 2008
- Wednesday, March 26, 2008
- Friday, March 28, 2008
- Thursday, May 01, 2008
- Friday, May 02, 2008
- Friday, May 16, 2008
- Friday, June 06, 2008
- Tuesday, June 17, 2008
- Monday, July 14, 2008
- Thursday, July 31, 2008
- Friday, August 01, 2008
- Friday, August 08, 2008
- Saturday, August 09, 2008
- Monday, September 22, 2008
- Friday, October 03, 2008
- Saturday, October 04, 2008
- Wednesday, October 22, 2008
- Thursday, October 23, 2008
- Friday, October 24, 2008
- Saturday, October 25, 2008
- Friday, November 21, 2008
- Wednesday, February 25, 2009
- Thursday, February 26, 2009
- Saturday, March 28, 2009
- Wednesday, April 29, 2009
- Thursday, April 30, 2009
- Friday, May 01, 2009
- Thursday, May 14, 2009
- Friday, May 15, 2009
- Wednesday, May 27, 2009
- Thursday, June 04, 2009
- Friday, June 05, 2009
- Thursday, August 06, 2009
- Friday, August 07, 2009
- Saturday, August 08, 2009
- Wednesday, September 09, 2009
- Friday, October 02, 2009
- Saturday, October 03, 2009
- Saturday, October 24, 2009
- Wednesday, November 04, 2009
- Thursday, November 05, 2009
- Friday, November 06, 2009
- Saturday, January 30, 2010
- Friday, July 09, 2010
Mark Cramer's C & X Report for the HandicappingEdge.Com.
Friday, May 19, 2006
PREAKNESS
Here we go again. Tough to squeeze something out of this race because the fave is legit, the second fave is a legit second fave, and by the process of elimination, the lightly-raced BERNARDINI looks like the longshot exotic inclusion, but it seems as if we're not the only ones who see it that way.
BARBARO got a "big win" from the Derby and is fresh. There is no reason to dislike him, and the only argument of the negative spin doctors is that Barbaro's coming back in only 2 weeks, whereas his previous races, all wins, were spaced out with layoffs.
BROTHER DEREK could be worth an action win bet if the odds differential is big enough between BD and Barbaro. My view is that, for Brother Derek, the Kentucky Derby was a prep race for the Preakness. In the Derby, impossibly wide, taking up, and in an outside post where he could not exert his usual control, he learned to pass horses, and did so while losing a shoe.
After studying Like Now, Greeley's Legacy and Sweetnorthernsaint's common race, the Gotham, I've decided that the Gotham was probably a negative key race. Most of the actors from that race came back to run a significantly slower Beyer fig.
Platinum Couple has a less-than-10 percent trainer-rider combo. Toss. Hemingway's Key needs to improve too much and needs to do so against legit faves. Out. Diabolical defeated only 4 horses (not his fault for small field) in an allowance nw1. I can't get hot for Diabolical.
Of the three Gotham horses, I suppose LIKE NOW has the most right to move up since he won that race against the bias, and has a big trainer. However, he came back to a relative uninteresting performance. Sweetnorthernsaint would not be a total surprise if he runs back to one of his domineering races, but his relatively low odds don't seem to warrant the risk. BROTHER DEREK had much more trouble in the Derby than SNS.
My knock on BERNARDINO is that he could really be preparing for the Belmont. His pedigree says he can run all day. But this is a plus on his stretchout for the Preakness. His trainer, Albertini, is both a high percentage stakes winner and a flat-bet profit trainer.
On this C&X website, yours truly has called the Preakness exacta the last two years, and I will use a similar strategy this year. (I can't remember ever having 3 in a row in any Triple Crown race.) We had recommended exotic inclusions. In 2005, Scrappy T was an exotic inclusion on this website and he finished second at 13-1. In 2004, Rock Hard Ten was the key, and he finished place at 6-1.
This year, BERNARDINI is the exotic inclusion. He's fourth fave on the ML. He's bred to improve with distance, and his trainer is one to back with 31% wins in stakes. The pace could do him in but I suspect that the pace may not be so fast, as everyone's saying their horse does not need the lead. BROTHER DEREK should have a much better scenario, and if the gap between his odds and those of BARBARO is big enough, he can be worth some win money. Barbaro remains a legit favorite.
I won't be near my e-mail this eve but in case I check and someone has an interesting angle, I'll post tomorrow. Today I'm treating myself well. I went to the races this afternoon and nothing will ever compare with the live product, and I'm having a beer with a friend at a neighborhood bar, trying to be less electronic for awhile.
Cheers,
Mark
Here we go again. Tough to squeeze something out of this race because the fave is legit, the second fave is a legit second fave, and by the process of elimination, the lightly-raced BERNARDINI looks like the longshot exotic inclusion, but it seems as if we're not the only ones who see it that way.
BARBARO got a "big win" from the Derby and is fresh. There is no reason to dislike him, and the only argument of the negative spin doctors is that Barbaro's coming back in only 2 weeks, whereas his previous races, all wins, were spaced out with layoffs.
BROTHER DEREK could be worth an action win bet if the odds differential is big enough between BD and Barbaro. My view is that, for Brother Derek, the Kentucky Derby was a prep race for the Preakness. In the Derby, impossibly wide, taking up, and in an outside post where he could not exert his usual control, he learned to pass horses, and did so while losing a shoe.
After studying Like Now, Greeley's Legacy and Sweetnorthernsaint's common race, the Gotham, I've decided that the Gotham was probably a negative key race. Most of the actors from that race came back to run a significantly slower Beyer fig.
Platinum Couple has a less-than-10 percent trainer-rider combo. Toss. Hemingway's Key needs to improve too much and needs to do so against legit faves. Out. Diabolical defeated only 4 horses (not his fault for small field) in an allowance nw1. I can't get hot for Diabolical.
Of the three Gotham horses, I suppose LIKE NOW has the most right to move up since he won that race against the bias, and has a big trainer. However, he came back to a relative uninteresting performance. Sweetnorthernsaint would not be a total surprise if he runs back to one of his domineering races, but his relatively low odds don't seem to warrant the risk. BROTHER DEREK had much more trouble in the Derby than SNS.
My knock on BERNARDINO is that he could really be preparing for the Belmont. His pedigree says he can run all day. But this is a plus on his stretchout for the Preakness. His trainer, Albertini, is both a high percentage stakes winner and a flat-bet profit trainer.
On this C&X website, yours truly has called the Preakness exacta the last two years, and I will use a similar strategy this year. (I can't remember ever having 3 in a row in any Triple Crown race.) We had recommended exotic inclusions. In 2005, Scrappy T was an exotic inclusion on this website and he finished second at 13-1. In 2004, Rock Hard Ten was the key, and he finished place at 6-1.
This year, BERNARDINI is the exotic inclusion. He's fourth fave on the ML. He's bred to improve with distance, and his trainer is one to back with 31% wins in stakes. The pace could do him in but I suspect that the pace may not be so fast, as everyone's saying their horse does not need the lead. BROTHER DEREK should have a much better scenario, and if the gap between his odds and those of BARBARO is big enough, he can be worth some win money. Barbaro remains a legit favorite.
I won't be near my e-mail this eve but in case I check and someone has an interesting angle, I'll post tomorrow. Today I'm treating myself well. I went to the races this afternoon and nothing will ever compare with the live product, and I'm having a beer with a friend at a neighborhood bar, trying to be less electronic for awhile.
Cheers,
Mark