Links
- Handicapping Edge <% if LEN(SESSION("ADMIN"))>0 then %>
- Control Panel
- Wesite Doc
- Blog Editor <% end if %>
Archives
- Sunday, January 25, 2004
- Monday, June 07, 2004
- Thursday, July 01, 2004
- Monday, July 05, 2004
- Thursday, July 15, 2004
- Friday, July 16, 2004
- Thursday, July 29, 2004
- Wednesday, August 04, 2004
- Saturday, August 28, 2004
- Tuesday, August 31, 2004
- Wednesday, September 01, 2004
- Thursday, September 02, 2004
- Friday, September 03, 2004
- Sunday, September 05, 2004
- Monday, September 06, 2004
- Friday, September 17, 2004
- Saturday, October 02, 2004
- Tuesday, October 05, 2004
- Wednesday, October 06, 2004
- Monday, October 25, 2004
- Tuesday, October 26, 2004
- Wednesday, December 08, 2004
- Thursday, January 06, 2005
- Saturday, February 05, 2005
- Monday, February 28, 2005
- Thursday, March 24, 2005
- Thursday, March 31, 2005
- Friday, April 01, 2005
- Monday, April 04, 2005
- Thursday, May 05, 2005
- Friday, May 06, 2005
- Wednesday, May 18, 2005
- Thursday, May 19, 2005
- Friday, May 20, 2005
- Monday, June 06, 2005
- Thursday, June 09, 2005
- Friday, June 10, 2005
- Saturday, June 11, 2005
- Monday, June 13, 2005
- Friday, July 01, 2005
- Saturday, July 02, 2005
- Thursday, July 14, 2005
- Friday, July 15, 2005
- Saturday, July 16, 2005
- Tuesday, July 26, 2005
- Thursday, September 01, 2005
- Friday, September 30, 2005
- Saturday, October 01, 2005
- Sunday, October 02, 2005
- Tuesday, October 04, 2005
- Monday, October 24, 2005
- Wednesday, October 26, 2005
- Thursday, October 27, 2005
- Friday, October 28, 2005
- Saturday, November 12, 2005
- Friday, December 16, 2005
- Sunday, January 29, 2006
- Wednesday, March 15, 2006
- Thursday, April 06, 2006
- Friday, April 07, 2006
- Saturday, April 08, 2006
- Thursday, May 04, 2006
- Friday, May 05, 2006
- Saturday, May 06, 2006
- Friday, May 19, 2006
- Saturday, May 20, 2006
- Saturday, May 27, 2006
- Friday, June 09, 2006
- Friday, July 07, 2006
- Friday, July 14, 2006
- Wednesday, August 09, 2006
- Wednesday, August 23, 2006
- Friday, September 29, 2006
- Saturday, September 30, 2006
- Sunday, October 01, 2006
- Tuesday, October 31, 2006
- Wednesday, November 01, 2006
- Thursday, November 02, 2006
- Friday, November 03, 2006
- Monday, November 13, 2006
- Thursday, January 04, 2007
- Friday, February 16, 2007
- Sunday, April 22, 2007
- Thursday, May 03, 2007
- Friday, May 04, 2007
- Friday, May 18, 2007
- Thursday, June 07, 2007
- Sunday, June 24, 2007
- Friday, August 10, 2007
- Sunday, August 12, 2007
- Friday, August 17, 2007
- Tuesday, September 18, 2007
- Wednesday, September 19, 2007
- Friday, October 05, 2007
- Saturday, October 06, 2007
- Wednesday, October 24, 2007
- Thursday, October 25, 2007
- Friday, October 26, 2007
- Saturday, October 27, 2007
- Monday, November 19, 2007
- Monday, January 07, 2008
- Monday, February 18, 2008
- Wednesday, March 26, 2008
- Friday, March 28, 2008
- Thursday, May 01, 2008
- Friday, May 02, 2008
- Friday, May 16, 2008
- Friday, June 06, 2008
- Tuesday, June 17, 2008
- Monday, July 14, 2008
- Thursday, July 31, 2008
- Friday, August 01, 2008
- Friday, August 08, 2008
- Saturday, August 09, 2008
- Monday, September 22, 2008
- Friday, October 03, 2008
- Saturday, October 04, 2008
- Wednesday, October 22, 2008
- Thursday, October 23, 2008
- Friday, October 24, 2008
- Saturday, October 25, 2008
- Friday, November 21, 2008
- Wednesday, February 25, 2009
- Thursday, February 26, 2009
- Saturday, March 28, 2009
- Wednesday, April 29, 2009
- Thursday, April 30, 2009
- Friday, May 01, 2009
- Thursday, May 14, 2009
- Friday, May 15, 2009
- Wednesday, May 27, 2009
- Thursday, June 04, 2009
- Friday, June 05, 2009
- Thursday, August 06, 2009
- Friday, August 07, 2009
- Saturday, August 08, 2009
- Wednesday, September 09, 2009
- Friday, October 02, 2009
- Saturday, October 03, 2009
- Saturday, October 24, 2009
- Wednesday, November 04, 2009
- Thursday, November 05, 2009
- Friday, November 06, 2009
- Saturday, January 30, 2010
- Friday, July 09, 2010
Mark Cramer's C & X Report for the HandicappingEdge.Com.
Friday, April 07, 2006
KNOCK ON WOOD AGAIN
Bill's post of Greeley's Legacy convinced me to restudy the pps. I'm gonna allow you to see the process of my thought, risking embarrassment after Bill correctly noted that my comments were "sparse".
Can of Worms
The problem here is that once we consider Greeley's Legacy, we need to review the whole crew of late developers who were racing, like GL, on the Aqueduct inner dirt course. Originally, I felt that Greeley's Legacy should have held a home field advantage on the inner course in his previous race, and winter inner dirt horses are all suspect to me. Reconsidering GL means we should also reconsider Marco's Tale. In appearance, Coa chose Greeley over Marco, but Marco may not have been entered in this race until after Coa had committed. Marco gets a hot rider for a high-percentage/low-profile stable.
Let's talk about individual horses.
BOB AND JOHN. Normally I love horses that win again and again by huge margins. But this guy was only above odds-on once in those big wins, and that was 6/5. Nevertheless, you cannot blame him too much for the horses he left in his wake.
GREELEY'S LEGACY. There are two other positives. First, he had a Big Win two races back, and the trip in the Gothem, as Bill noted, may have prevented him from making the Big Win method look good. What I really like is that he improved and won when stretching out to 1 1/8.
I've been hung up on my research on horses that win early, and not so keen on late developers. Remember the long-term research shows that early bloomers are more productive in later races than late bloomers.
In summary, we have the recent Big Win and the improve-when-stretching-out to 1 1/8/
JAZIL. I really only have two dimensions for using this horse as an exotic inclusion: the trainer and the breeding, which would really come in handy if this track comes up sloppy. However, Jazil's narrow maiden win was over a horse named Tastyville. The same Tastyville was trounced by the debut winner Scanlon's Song. I do believe in trainer determinism, and this guy's trainer is in one of his hot clusters.
MARCO'S TALE. Here we have another late developer, and another horse whose best is at 1 1/8 (in fact, with two convincing wins at the distance). There's a hot rider and a small stable with a 26% record. Marco lost to Greeley by only 3/4 and then improved at tomorrow's distance.
As you can see, there's lots to think about. Marco's Tale was only entered in this race after two horses were scratched. Is that opportunism or pure home-for-the-best. The high percentage of the trainer tells us we should take this one seriously.
As you can see, this race is growing on me. I would like to sleep on this one and let things develop in my subconsious, which means I'll ask you to check in one last time tomorrow morn.
If anyone has opinions about where to situate the inner dirt horses in the hierarchy of values, say, compared with Santa Anita, send me an e-mail. I will check my mail before I post bright and early tomorrow morn.
Mark
Bill's post of Greeley's Legacy convinced me to restudy the pps. I'm gonna allow you to see the process of my thought, risking embarrassment after Bill correctly noted that my comments were "sparse".
Can of Worms
The problem here is that once we consider Greeley's Legacy, we need to review the whole crew of late developers who were racing, like GL, on the Aqueduct inner dirt course. Originally, I felt that Greeley's Legacy should have held a home field advantage on the inner course in his previous race, and winter inner dirt horses are all suspect to me. Reconsidering GL means we should also reconsider Marco's Tale. In appearance, Coa chose Greeley over Marco, but Marco may not have been entered in this race until after Coa had committed. Marco gets a hot rider for a high-percentage/low-profile stable.
Let's talk about individual horses.
BOB AND JOHN. Normally I love horses that win again and again by huge margins. But this guy was only above odds-on once in those big wins, and that was 6/5. Nevertheless, you cannot blame him too much for the horses he left in his wake.
GREELEY'S LEGACY. There are two other positives. First, he had a Big Win two races back, and the trip in the Gothem, as Bill noted, may have prevented him from making the Big Win method look good. What I really like is that he improved and won when stretching out to 1 1/8.
I've been hung up on my research on horses that win early, and not so keen on late developers. Remember the long-term research shows that early bloomers are more productive in later races than late bloomers.
In summary, we have the recent Big Win and the improve-when-stretching-out to 1 1/8/
JAZIL. I really only have two dimensions for using this horse as an exotic inclusion: the trainer and the breeding, which would really come in handy if this track comes up sloppy. However, Jazil's narrow maiden win was over a horse named Tastyville. The same Tastyville was trounced by the debut winner Scanlon's Song. I do believe in trainer determinism, and this guy's trainer is in one of his hot clusters.
MARCO'S TALE. Here we have another late developer, and another horse whose best is at 1 1/8 (in fact, with two convincing wins at the distance). There's a hot rider and a small stable with a 26% record. Marco lost to Greeley by only 3/4 and then improved at tomorrow's distance.
As you can see, there's lots to think about. Marco's Tale was only entered in this race after two horses were scratched. Is that opportunism or pure home-for-the-best. The high percentage of the trainer tells us we should take this one seriously.
As you can see, this race is growing on me. I would like to sleep on this one and let things develop in my subconsious, which means I'll ask you to check in one last time tomorrow morn.
If anyone has opinions about where to situate the inner dirt horses in the hierarchy of values, say, compared with Santa Anita, send me an e-mail. I will check my mail before I post bright and early tomorrow morn.
Mark
This post is from a reader, a different Bill. We have lots of good handicappers named Bill. I'm gonna look again at Greely's Legacy. For me this may have been a case of premature conclusions based on stuff I got off the web. (They also sell cures for cancer on the web.) Read the contents of this post and you will see that, win or lose for Greeley's Legacy, this man is a real thinker and analyst.
Mark
Hi, Mark---I just saw your post on the Wood, which was, I humbly suggest, a sparse discussion. I'd suggest you take a close look @ Greely's Legacy. The horse has been VERY slow in developing, but IS developing, and has a LOT of potential. The horse is nominally trained by George Weaver, but George went to Florida for the winter. His entire New York string has been in the complete charge of his assistant, Lawrence Ulrich. Lawrence has never trained in his own name, is completely unknown to the public, but is extremely well-regarded and respected by his peers (He was, at one time, THE trainer on the farm for Golden Eagle Farms during their heyday). Ulrich is about 25% at Aqueduct this winter, with a HUGE R.O.I. (which would have improved had not his 24-1 horse been beaten a neck in last Saturday's 7th!). In any case, I know Ulrich expects this horse to have a big future. Note that Greely's Legacy lost by only 11/2 in the Gotham, while stuck inside the entire stretch in a questionable ride by Coa, since he KNEW that the horse has ALWAYS hated being inside!. Ulrich has been working on this "problem", though, and sees further improvement. The horse worked last Sat. INSIDE a workmate w/ Coa up and the work was outstanding. It won't show in the DRF as a fast work, BUT the work was the fastest 5f work between the 1st & 2d breaks by over 2 seconds (!!) with Coa never moving a muscle. Greely's Legacy has drawn the 6 post, and I know Ulrich is very happy with that. It's 5:30 p.m. EST and I just spoke to Lawrence. He is very low key, but actually believes he'll win the race tomorrow, UNLESS there is a very strong speed bias. Take it for what it's worth!---Bill
Mark
Hi, Mark---I just saw your post on the Wood, which was, I humbly suggest, a sparse discussion. I'd suggest you take a close look @ Greely's Legacy. The horse has been VERY slow in developing, but IS developing, and has a LOT of potential. The horse is nominally trained by George Weaver, but George went to Florida for the winter. His entire New York string has been in the complete charge of his assistant, Lawrence Ulrich. Lawrence has never trained in his own name, is completely unknown to the public, but is extremely well-regarded and respected by his peers (He was, at one time, THE trainer on the farm for Golden Eagle Farms during their heyday). Ulrich is about 25% at Aqueduct this winter, with a HUGE R.O.I. (which would have improved had not his 24-1 horse been beaten a neck in last Saturday's 7th!). In any case, I know Ulrich expects this horse to have a big future. Note that Greely's Legacy lost by only 11/2 in the Gotham, while stuck inside the entire stretch in a questionable ride by Coa, since he KNEW that the horse has ALWAYS hated being inside!. Ulrich has been working on this "problem", though, and sees further improvement. The horse worked last Sat. INSIDE a workmate w/ Coa up and the work was outstanding. It won't show in the DRF as a fast work, BUT the work was the fastest 5f work between the 1st & 2d breaks by over 2 seconds (!!) with Coa never moving a muscle. Greely's Legacy has drawn the 6 post, and I know Ulrich is very happy with that. It's 5:30 p.m. EST and I just spoke to Lawrence. He is very low key, but actually believes he'll win the race tomorrow, UNLESS there is a very strong speed bias. Take it for what it's worth!---Bill
WOOD MEMORIAL
Weather report inconclusive as to track condition tomorrow. Normally I'd go against Keyed Entry since he improves less the more he stretches out, so that he could get caught at the 1 1/8. Bob and John, on the other hand, has his best race at the longest distance. Litfin picks Keyed Entry, so perhaps Bob and John could at least have as high odds or higher than Keyed Entry. (In the slop, if it becomes sloppy, Keyed Entry could slosh on longer and hang in there.)
Bob and John's running style, especially when he's come from off the pace, may not have been most conducive to SoCal, so perhaps he could enjoy the east coast. He does have some excuses in his pps, as well.
So, most likely winner is Bob and John. That's not saying much odds-wise, so let's throw in an exotic inclusion, the rail horse Jazil.
Jazil has the same daddy and the same dam-sire as Bob and John, and that means both he and B & J should be able to handle a possible wet track. Jazil's hot trainer is what most appeals. He switches to his winning rider, he's been here before and liked it, and his Dam was a graded stakes winner on this track.
So that's my attempt to squeeze blood from a turnip.
PS. The Big A website said that Deputy Glitters was a probable scratch due to the track condition, otherwise this slayer of Bluegrass Cat would have gotten more mention here. Big trainer-rider combo and on the improve.
Weather report inconclusive as to track condition tomorrow. Normally I'd go against Keyed Entry since he improves less the more he stretches out, so that he could get caught at the 1 1/8. Bob and John, on the other hand, has his best race at the longest distance. Litfin picks Keyed Entry, so perhaps Bob and John could at least have as high odds or higher than Keyed Entry. (In the slop, if it becomes sloppy, Keyed Entry could slosh on longer and hang in there.)
Bob and John's running style, especially when he's come from off the pace, may not have been most conducive to SoCal, so perhaps he could enjoy the east coast. He does have some excuses in his pps, as well.
So, most likely winner is Bob and John. That's not saying much odds-wise, so let's throw in an exotic inclusion, the rail horse Jazil.
Jazil has the same daddy and the same dam-sire as Bob and John, and that means both he and B & J should be able to handle a possible wet track. Jazil's hot trainer is what most appeals. He switches to his winning rider, he's been here before and liked it, and his Dam was a graded stakes winner on this track.
So that's my attempt to squeeze blood from a turnip.
PS. The Big A website said that Deputy Glitters was a probable scratch due to the track condition, otherwise this slayer of Bluegrass Cat would have gotten more mention here. Big trainer-rider combo and on the improve.