Links
- Handicapping Edge <% if LEN(SESSION("ADMIN"))>0 then %>
- Control Panel
- Wesite Doc
- Blog Editor <% end if %>
Archives
- Sunday, January 25, 2004
- Monday, June 07, 2004
- Thursday, July 01, 2004
- Monday, July 05, 2004
- Thursday, July 15, 2004
- Friday, July 16, 2004
- Thursday, July 29, 2004
- Wednesday, August 04, 2004
- Saturday, August 28, 2004
- Tuesday, August 31, 2004
- Wednesday, September 01, 2004
- Thursday, September 02, 2004
- Friday, September 03, 2004
- Sunday, September 05, 2004
- Monday, September 06, 2004
- Friday, September 17, 2004
- Saturday, October 02, 2004
- Tuesday, October 05, 2004
- Wednesday, October 06, 2004
- Monday, October 25, 2004
- Tuesday, October 26, 2004
- Wednesday, December 08, 2004
- Thursday, January 06, 2005
- Saturday, February 05, 2005
- Monday, February 28, 2005
- Thursday, March 24, 2005
- Thursday, March 31, 2005
- Friday, April 01, 2005
- Monday, April 04, 2005
- Thursday, May 05, 2005
- Friday, May 06, 2005
- Wednesday, May 18, 2005
- Thursday, May 19, 2005
- Friday, May 20, 2005
- Monday, June 06, 2005
- Thursday, June 09, 2005
- Friday, June 10, 2005
- Saturday, June 11, 2005
- Monday, June 13, 2005
- Friday, July 01, 2005
- Saturday, July 02, 2005
- Thursday, July 14, 2005
- Friday, July 15, 2005
- Saturday, July 16, 2005
- Tuesday, July 26, 2005
- Thursday, September 01, 2005
- Friday, September 30, 2005
- Saturday, October 01, 2005
- Sunday, October 02, 2005
- Tuesday, October 04, 2005
- Monday, October 24, 2005
- Wednesday, October 26, 2005
- Thursday, October 27, 2005
- Friday, October 28, 2005
- Saturday, November 12, 2005
- Friday, December 16, 2005
- Sunday, January 29, 2006
- Wednesday, March 15, 2006
- Thursday, April 06, 2006
- Friday, April 07, 2006
- Saturday, April 08, 2006
- Thursday, May 04, 2006
- Friday, May 05, 2006
- Saturday, May 06, 2006
- Friday, May 19, 2006
- Saturday, May 20, 2006
- Saturday, May 27, 2006
- Friday, June 09, 2006
- Friday, July 07, 2006
- Friday, July 14, 2006
- Wednesday, August 09, 2006
- Wednesday, August 23, 2006
- Friday, September 29, 2006
- Saturday, September 30, 2006
- Sunday, October 01, 2006
- Tuesday, October 31, 2006
- Wednesday, November 01, 2006
- Thursday, November 02, 2006
- Friday, November 03, 2006
- Monday, November 13, 2006
- Thursday, January 04, 2007
- Friday, February 16, 2007
- Sunday, April 22, 2007
- Thursday, May 03, 2007
- Friday, May 04, 2007
- Friday, May 18, 2007
- Thursday, June 07, 2007
- Sunday, June 24, 2007
- Friday, August 10, 2007
- Sunday, August 12, 2007
- Friday, August 17, 2007
- Tuesday, September 18, 2007
- Wednesday, September 19, 2007
- Friday, October 05, 2007
- Saturday, October 06, 2007
- Wednesday, October 24, 2007
- Thursday, October 25, 2007
- Friday, October 26, 2007
- Saturday, October 27, 2007
- Monday, November 19, 2007
- Monday, January 07, 2008
- Monday, February 18, 2008
- Wednesday, March 26, 2008
- Friday, March 28, 2008
- Thursday, May 01, 2008
- Friday, May 02, 2008
- Friday, May 16, 2008
- Friday, June 06, 2008
- Tuesday, June 17, 2008
- Monday, July 14, 2008
- Thursday, July 31, 2008
- Friday, August 01, 2008
- Friday, August 08, 2008
- Saturday, August 09, 2008
- Monday, September 22, 2008
- Friday, October 03, 2008
- Saturday, October 04, 2008
- Wednesday, October 22, 2008
- Thursday, October 23, 2008
- Friday, October 24, 2008
- Saturday, October 25, 2008
- Friday, November 21, 2008
- Wednesday, February 25, 2009
- Thursday, February 26, 2009
- Saturday, March 28, 2009
- Wednesday, April 29, 2009
- Thursday, April 30, 2009
- Friday, May 01, 2009
- Thursday, May 14, 2009
- Friday, May 15, 2009
- Wednesday, May 27, 2009
- Thursday, June 04, 2009
- Friday, June 05, 2009
- Thursday, August 06, 2009
- Friday, August 07, 2009
- Saturday, August 08, 2009
- Wednesday, September 09, 2009
- Friday, October 02, 2009
- Saturday, October 03, 2009
- Saturday, October 24, 2009
- Wednesday, November 04, 2009
- Thursday, November 05, 2009
- Friday, November 06, 2009
- Saturday, January 30, 2010
- Friday, July 09, 2010
Mark Cramer's C & X Report for the HandicappingEdge.Com.
Sunday, September 05, 2004
Following my own line instructions in the Forego, I bet my key horse A Huevo to win, and keyed him in the trifectas. Needless to say, I lost. With a small investment, I got it all back, but nothing more, by using Clock Stopper as a partial backwheel horse in the exacta, in respect to my posted words: "finds a way to just miss. Backwheel anyone? Has the aura of second place ..."
One day I will have the guts to make the backwheel my main bet, which would have happened if A Huevo had gone off at below my required 6-1.
For the Pennsylvania Derby, I had to respond to two crucial questions:
First, does my personal odds line come up with something different from the Morning Line. My answer was "No".
Second, can I eliminate at least half the field. Answer: also "no".
This means that I am obligated to give you a courageous opinion on this race: that I will pass it. "Courageous" because, at the time when subscription renewals are open, I know that the best way to lose a subscriber is to recommend passing a race. Most folks would rather I recommend a hopeless bomb than a pass. So I am guaranteed the disappointment of many readers. But what choice do I have, when my first contender is the ML fave, my second contender is the ML second choice and my third contender is the ML third choice?
I have to admit it. No major discoveries here.
I was first attracted to this race because it's the Derby B team, and with A team defections, a possible new kid on the block could emerge from this race as a possible A team candidate. So I projected.
LOVE OF MONEY? Dutrow's a great trainer, but a 6-length win in the slop at alw nw1 is not a great indicator, pro or con. The 25% Dutrow is only a 17 percent winner in stakes, and a thorough flat bet loss. The breeding says maybe 1 1/6 but not necessarily 1 1/8. This is an "if" candidate that cannot be completely tossed, but cannot be projected. In a B-team field with no real A-team candidates, this is the mystery horse. In a race without much route speed at all, we have a sprint speed horse going long. Always a danger.
TAPIT? Normally the "entrapped epiglottis" angle would be an automatic bet. But he's the ML favorite and he's got the horrendous 12 post. I could love him, but not at low odds.
POLLARD'S VISION? Would anyone be surprised if Todd Pletcher won another stakes race? J.R. is flying in from Saratoga especially to ride this horse.
MY SNOOKIE'S BOY? He has crowd favorite Elliott, from the rail, and was oh so close in the Haskell, at 20-1, an overachiever. No surprise if he won it.
MASTER DAVID? Another Frankel layoff horse with a beautiful workout on 23Aug that suggest he is ready to fire. He would have to be an improved horse over when he could not defeat Tapit with a perfect trip. He's older, more mature, and gets blinkers. Not out of it.
SWINGFORTHEFENCES? Reportedly bled through the L in the Haskell. He was near Tapit and Master David but improved since then (speed ratings up; beat some horses that he lost to before). Not out of it.
SEPARATO? A double Big Win horse, completely reborn with his new stable, local horse, 20 percent trainer, needs a huge pace up front, and may not get it. The trainer said he'd be thrilled with a finish in the top 4. I can visualize this one getting into the tri at a decent price for a hot trainer.
SONG OF THE SWORD? Even this horse, one that I have essentially eliminated, has a chance. His only two bad races were when completely overmatched. Won when fresh as a first-time-starter, so coming back after a layoff is a positive attribute. He was within 3 lengths of Pollard's Vision in the Illinois Derby after being steadied on the first turn. Great works. Has hot rider. I would say to bet this horse automatically when they move to the Aqueduct inner dirt course.
There are still other horses that can't be eliminated for various reasons, and as sometimes happens, when I go deep, I do not go deep enough.
In summary, the epiglottis horse Tapit's odds figure to be too low from the outside post, and good info loses its power when everyone has it.
As I have said before, a winning horseplayer may be like a guerrilla warrior, unable to defeat a standing army, but capable of descending from the hills to win important battles when picking his own spot. In this race, I feel as if I am facing a standing army.
I know, you're all shouting, "Cramer is a bum" but I'm passing this race. Don't shout too loud or you might get an entrapped epiglottis. It's great to know there will be many other races to come. The Arc de Triomphe is next on our agenda, and I guarantee to have info on that one that no one else has.
One day I will have the guts to make the backwheel my main bet, which would have happened if A Huevo had gone off at below my required 6-1.
For the Pennsylvania Derby, I had to respond to two crucial questions:
First, does my personal odds line come up with something different from the Morning Line. My answer was "No".
Second, can I eliminate at least half the field. Answer: also "no".
This means that I am obligated to give you a courageous opinion on this race: that I will pass it. "Courageous" because, at the time when subscription renewals are open, I know that the best way to lose a subscriber is to recommend passing a race. Most folks would rather I recommend a hopeless bomb than a pass. So I am guaranteed the disappointment of many readers. But what choice do I have, when my first contender is the ML fave, my second contender is the ML second choice and my third contender is the ML third choice?
I have to admit it. No major discoveries here.
I was first attracted to this race because it's the Derby B team, and with A team defections, a possible new kid on the block could emerge from this race as a possible A team candidate. So I projected.
LOVE OF MONEY? Dutrow's a great trainer, but a 6-length win in the slop at alw nw1 is not a great indicator, pro or con. The 25% Dutrow is only a 17 percent winner in stakes, and a thorough flat bet loss. The breeding says maybe 1 1/6 but not necessarily 1 1/8. This is an "if" candidate that cannot be completely tossed, but cannot be projected. In a B-team field with no real A-team candidates, this is the mystery horse. In a race without much route speed at all, we have a sprint speed horse going long. Always a danger.
TAPIT? Normally the "entrapped epiglottis" angle would be an automatic bet. But he's the ML favorite and he's got the horrendous 12 post. I could love him, but not at low odds.
POLLARD'S VISION? Would anyone be surprised if Todd Pletcher won another stakes race? J.R. is flying in from Saratoga especially to ride this horse.
MY SNOOKIE'S BOY? He has crowd favorite Elliott, from the rail, and was oh so close in the Haskell, at 20-1, an overachiever. No surprise if he won it.
MASTER DAVID? Another Frankel layoff horse with a beautiful workout on 23Aug that suggest he is ready to fire. He would have to be an improved horse over when he could not defeat Tapit with a perfect trip. He's older, more mature, and gets blinkers. Not out of it.
SWINGFORTHEFENCES? Reportedly bled through the L in the Haskell. He was near Tapit and Master David but improved since then (speed ratings up; beat some horses that he lost to before). Not out of it.
SEPARATO? A double Big Win horse, completely reborn with his new stable, local horse, 20 percent trainer, needs a huge pace up front, and may not get it. The trainer said he'd be thrilled with a finish in the top 4. I can visualize this one getting into the tri at a decent price for a hot trainer.
SONG OF THE SWORD? Even this horse, one that I have essentially eliminated, has a chance. His only two bad races were when completely overmatched. Won when fresh as a first-time-starter, so coming back after a layoff is a positive attribute. He was within 3 lengths of Pollard's Vision in the Illinois Derby after being steadied on the first turn. Great works. Has hot rider. I would say to bet this horse automatically when they move to the Aqueduct inner dirt course.
There are still other horses that can't be eliminated for various reasons, and as sometimes happens, when I go deep, I do not go deep enough.
In summary, the epiglottis horse Tapit's odds figure to be too low from the outside post, and good info loses its power when everyone has it.
As I have said before, a winning horseplayer may be like a guerrilla warrior, unable to defeat a standing army, but capable of descending from the hills to win important battles when picking his own spot. In this race, I feel as if I am facing a standing army.
I know, you're all shouting, "Cramer is a bum" but I'm passing this race. Don't shout too loud or you might get an entrapped epiglottis. It's great to know there will be many other races to come. The Arc de Triomphe is next on our agenda, and I guarantee to have info on that one that no one else has.